1. Does the author propound an innovative thesis / theses?
2. Does the author show a methodically reflective and effective approach?
3. Can you discern a convincing structure and argumentation?
4. Has the author sufficiently considered previous academic research on the topic?
5. Does the text show any other content-related deficiencies?
6. Do the article’s language and style adequately meet academic standards?
7. Would you suggest improvements to the author?

 

Final vote: Admission to publication:

• - The article will be published
  
  

• - The article will be published with slight changes, considering the peer reviewers’ suggestions for improvement (Cf. key question seven).
  
  

• - The article should only be published with significant changes and after resubmission
  
  

• - The article will be rejected